Prep Documents
Criteria:
A: I felt like I had a good overall knowledge and understanding but I was so nervous that it did not come through. I would give myself a 4-5 on this. It was superficial in the sense I made claims but barely backed them up with examples. It verged on adequate because some of these were backed up and supported the context.
B: I would give myself a 3-4 because I mentioned literary features but did not go into much dept and struggled with referencing examples. This was really hard for me to figure out because my organization fluctuated within the IOC pratice.
C: Organization was like a 2-- because of this, the rest of my IOC practice struggled. I found myself forgetting to mention Shakespeares name and connecting to my claim. I also found myself jumping around from point to point.
D: My language was a 2 because it was occasionally clear but I used terms such as "like" and "sneaky" because of my nerves. I needed to be more professional and flow each section and point together more.
Hello Abigail Layne Regan! I really enjoyed this practice IOC, and thought you could have definitely scored yourself higher. You seemed to really understand the passage and the broader purpose Shakespeare had in writing it. Next time just don't be nervous and you'll do great!!
ReplyDeleteABBY! this was really good and I agree with Ash that you definitely could've scored yourself higher. Your knowledge and insight was really clear, and although you were a bit nervous, you still spoke clearly. Your arguments were well done and well supported. Awesome job girl, I think if you keep up the good work, you will no doubt score high on the real thing!
ReplyDeleteHey sis!! I really enjoyed listening to your practice IOC a lot! I thought you explained your arguments and literary techniques well and your language was very clear and easy to follow. I would just be more confident in yourself because you definitely know what you're talking about. Overall, good job!
ReplyDeleteHey Abby!
ReplyDelete- Good organization at the beginning
- You maintain strong focus- I like that you selected several themes to examine and organize your commentary that way, selecting techniques used to establish said theme *you seem a bit flustered at the end*
- You do a nice job examining the effect of the techniques on the text, but be sure to also discuss the effect the techniques have on the reader (criteria B on the rubric)
- What is the overall effect?
A: 6
B: 6
C: 4
D: 4